2003-04-23 Rolling ETCon notes http://www.blackbeltjones.com/loft873/Pages/Image9.html -- lego based emergence simulation thing, plugging in inputs and outputs Sketches: . the sound of keyboards like rainwater, or masts at a marina . furtive chest glances trying to read namebadges . BA using two pilots. i need to talk more about this http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/mtarchive/001434.html "The first two sessions of the Emerging Tech conference raised the issue: What should technologists be doing to keep the Net free and content open?" etcon chump: http://www.peerfear.org/chump/etcon/ the death of the password http://www.computerweekly.com/articles/article.asp?liArticleID=121121& liArticleTypeID=1&liCategoryID=1&liChannelID=13&liFlavourID=1&sSearch=&nPage=1 via, on a government spin http://www.diverdiver.com/egovblog.html#200188684 GIS notes http://www.crystalflame.net/archives/000050.html Intriguing: "Key point: Maps are a narrative." More notes http://www.pobox.com/~dnm/etcon2003/biocomputing.txt http://www.pobox.com/~dnm/etcon2003/gnuradio.txt best coverage http://www.kottke.org/etech2003/ so i'm trying to think what the basic problem we're solving at this conference is, like last year it was secret properties of successful emergent technology. i think maybe the scaling/ reading problem here. how do you deal with enormous amounts of data? location as a first cut? latent semantic indexing? ants to find trails? hm. Just got this from mjones: codec/codex/polis/personae meaning the city. we are not feeling space, we're understanding it - cf. gaston bachelard: poetics of space, dr. simon unwin: analysing architectureafter terrawarms's datarate workthe software we use to compress/decompress the city eperience what do we lose/focus/keep/combinewhy do codecs and codex become 'personified'visiting a city - with a friend, visiting a native, exploring with a native, exploring with a guide. continuum of codecs/codexless spatial, more sematics - nodes and arcs if you're with a native guide - spatial first principles if you are on your own. build build build. build your clusters, built from nodes, mr becks maps - nodes and arcs but hides the clusters, hides the spatial/semantic blur - teleporting not trravelling. the image of the city - kevin lynch: 1963the human city codec.we build our cities and they shape us, and we continue to shape them - but the middle percepieving of the shape is diff - depending on your codex, which adapts to your circumstances, social and envirnomental. social, more negotiable... Matt Locke: http://www.test.org.uk/archives/000423.html "The case for 'local' metaphors" even though it's about DRM, this is completely what it's all about embeddedness. maybe this is the year ETCon realises *quite* how bit the world is. So many cool things to do with blogposts. We need them in some kind of centralised YET local system. NNTP. Again! Good for reading, and good for having a copy to place about with. Notes on Gonzo mapping with lots of see alsos: http://www.windley.com/2003/04/23.html#a574 Good! Themes from the conference, http://erikbenson.com/index.cgi?node=Notes%20from%20Emerging%20Technology% 20Conference%202003 Various unrelated links: http://www.iaslash.org/node.php?id=7347 -- web navigation magazine http://freshmeat.net/projects/synergyosx/?topic_id=122 -- iTunes controller in the menubar http://bitworking.org/news/XHTML___XForms___XLink___Xanadu -- xhtml, xforms, xlink leading to xanadu, but this is a bad thing, via diveintomark.org Some interesting stuff on Kevin Marks' weblog: http://epeus.blogspot.com/2003_04_01_epeus_archive.html#200186448 "A while back I mentioned Pinker's 'Blank Slate' in response to one of Chris Locke's missives, and Stavros offered to explain the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis. He did so today, in great detail, along with fascinating commentary on Korean grammar and society, and how different forms of words are used depending on who one is talking to. I still think Sapir-Whorf is a load of tosh, but this seems to be a consensus now (unless Simon, Dorothea and Akma want to wade in). I would agree is that previously heard or read language shapes subsequent utterances. Philip Hensher talks of the long linguistic shadow cast by the King James Bible." ...which leads to: http://www.emptybottle.org/glass/003234.php which I'm going to have to read, but haven't yet.