2003-06-28 D&G- How it ends p514 """ Every abstract machine is linked to other abstract machines, not only because they are inseparably political, economic, scientific, artistic, ecological, cosmic--perceptive, affective, acting, thinking, physical, and semiotic--but because their various types are as intertwined as their operations are convergent. Mechanosphere. """ Mechanosphere? Something that worries me a little... We rely on certain people to have philosophical ideas, ideas about how the universe works. These concepts aren't immediately apparent to others, they go above the complexity exchange limit, we have the "coming down from the mountain" thing. Perhaps these concepts feel natural to D&G, perhaps they're apparent from the way the universe looks to them, but they're not to most people. So the logic isn't open to scrutiny. There was a breakpoint when literate culture emerged that arguments were not longer inevitably won by the most articulate person -- the thought processes could be put down on paper, examined, collaborated on, agreed on and finally presented. Science is subject to this (maybe even emergent from it). But these philosophical ideas -- they're so much more fundamental than how the universe works: they're how the universe works + how we work + the combination of those two + the combination of all of that before + to infinity (like the smells of the two ingredients in my soup combining and recombining). To analyse that, paper isn't sufficient. Perception itself needs a literate breakpoint. We need to add an extra dimension to collaborate on what it means for humanity to perceive something, otherwise we're just taking people's words for something. All that D&G are saying is complex slices across the words we have, it could be simple in another way. That's another reason it's so tough. Furthermore, how universal is this? Is it a Western view? Or are they saying that it applies just as much to other coherences? What do other coherences have in place of D&G? Massively different again? What is the overarching philosophy?