<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="0.91">
<channel>
<title>The Notebooks of Leonardo Da Vinci</title>
<link>http://interconnected.org/home/more/davinci/</link>
<description>Day-by-day Da Vinci. Read the pages of the Notebooks by RSS, one at a time. This feed began on 10 August 2012.</description>

<item>
<title>Page 285</title>
<link>http://interconnected.org/home/more/davinci/285.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>An object represented in white and black will display stronger
<br>relief than in any other way; hence I would remind you O Painter! to
<br>dress your figures in the lightest colours you can, since, if you
<br>put them in dark colours, they will be in too slight relief and
<br>inconspicuous from a distance. And the reason is that the shadows of
<br>all objects are dark. And if you make a dress dark there is little
<br>variety in the lights and shadows, while in light colours there are
<br>many grades.</p>]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Page 284</title>
<link>http://interconnected.org/home/more/davinci/284.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>WHY BEAUTIFUL COLOURS MUST BE IN THE [HIGHEST] LIGHT.
<br>
<br>Since we see that the quality of colour is known [only] by means of
<br>light, it is to be supposed that where there is most light the true
<br>character of a colour in light will be best seen; and where there is
<br>most shadow the colour will be affected by the tone of that. Hence,
<br>O Painter! remember to show the true quality of colours in bright
<br>lights.</p>]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Page 283</title>
<link>http://interconnected.org/home/more/davinci/283.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>WHAT PORTION OF A COLOURED SURFACE OUGHT IN REASON TO BE THE MOST
<br>INTENSE.
<br>
<br>If _a_ is the light, and _b_ illuminated by it in a direct line,
<br>_c_, on which the light cannot fall, is lighted only by reflection
<br>from _b_ which, let us say, is red. Hence the light reflected from
<br>it, will be affected by the hue of the surface causing it and will
<br>tinge the surface _c_ with red. And if _c_ is also red you will see
<br>it much more intense than _b_; and if it were yellow you would see
<br>there a colour between yellow and red.
<br>
<br>On the use of dark and light colours in painting (284--286).</p>]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Page 282</title>
<link>http://interconnected.org/home/more/davinci/282.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>PERSPECTIVE.
<br>
<br>That side of an object in light and shade which is towards the light
<br>transmits the images of its details more distinctly and immediately
<br>to the eye than the side which is in shadow.
<br>
<br>PERSPECTIVE.
<br>
<br>The solar rays reflected on a square mirror will be thrown back to
<br>distant objects in a circular form.
<br>
<br>PERSPECTIVE.
<br>
<br>Any white and opaque surface will be partially coloured by
<br>reflections from surrounding objects.
<br>
<br>[Footnote 281. 282: The title line of these chapters is in the
<br>original simply _"pro"_, which may be an abbreviation for either
<br>_Propositione_ or _Prospettiva_--taking Prospettiva of course in its
<br>widest sense, as we often find it used in Leonardo's writings. The
<br>title _"pro"_ has here been understood to mean _Prospettiva_, in
<br>accordance with the suggestion afforded by page 10b of this same
<br>MS., where the first section is headed _Prospettiva_ in full (see
<br>No. 94), while the four following sections are headed merely _"pro"_
<br>(see No. 85).]</p>]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Page 281</title>
<link>http://interconnected.org/home/more/davinci/281.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>PERSPECTIVE.
<br>
<br>Every object devoid of colour in itself is more or less tinged by
<br>the colour [of the object] placed opposite. This may be seen by
<br>experience, inasmuch as any object which mirrors another assumes the
<br>colour of the object mirrored in it. And if the surface thus
<br>partially coloured is white the portion which has a red reflection
<br>will appear red, or any other colour, whether bright or dark.
<br>
<br>PERSPECTIVE.
<br>
<br>Every opaque and colourless body assumes the hue of the colour
<br>reflected on it; as happens with a white wall.</p>]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Page 280</title>
<link>http://interconnected.org/home/more/davinci/280.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>OF COLOURS.
<br>
<br>Of several colours, all equally white, that will look whitest which
<br>is against the darkest background. And black will look intensest
<br>against the whitest background.
<br>
<br>And red will look most vivid against the yellowest background; and
<br>the same is the case with all colours when surrounded by their
<br>strongest contrasts.
<br>
<br>On the reflection of colours (281-283).</p>]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Page 279</title>
<link>http://interconnected.org/home/more/davinci/279.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Since black, when painted next to white, looks no blacker than when
<br>next to black; and white when next to black looks no whiter than
<br>white, as is seen by the images transmitted through a small hole or
<br>by the edges of any opaque screen ...</p>]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Page 278</title>
<link>http://interconnected.org/home/more/davinci/278.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>OF PAINTING.
<br>
<br>[Footnote 2: See Footnote 3] Since white is not a colour but the
<br>neutral recipient of every colour [Footnote 3: _il bianco non e
<br>colore ma e inpotentia ricettiva d'ogni colore_ (white is not a
<br>colour, but the neutral recipient of every colour). LEON BATT.
<br>ALBERTI "_Della pittura_" libro I, asserts on the contrary: "_Il
<br>bianco e'l nero non sono veri colori, ma sono alteratione delli
<br>altri colori_" (ed. JANITSCHEK, p. 67; Vienna 1877).], when it is
<br>seen in the open air and high up, all its shadows are bluish; and
<br>this is caused, according to the 4th [prop.], which says: the
<br>surface of every opaque body assumes the hue of the surrounding
<br>objects. Now this white [body] being deprived of the light of the
<br>sun by the interposition of some body between the sun and itself,
<br>all that portion of it which is exposed to the sun and atmosphere
<br>assumes the colour of the sun and atmosphere; the side on which the
<br>sun does not fall remains in shadow and assumes the hue of the
<br>atmosphere. And if this white object did not reflect the green of
<br>the fields all the way to the horizon nor get the brightness of the
<br>horizon itself, it would certainly appear simply of the same hue as
<br>the atmosphere.
<br>
<br>On gradations in the depth of colours (279. 280).</p>]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Page 277</title>
<link>http://interconnected.org/home/more/davinci/277.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>No white or black is transparent.</p>]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Page 276</title>
<link>http://interconnected.org/home/more/davinci/276.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>OF THE COLOURS OF SIMPLE DERIVED SHADOWS.
<br>
<br>The colour of derived shadows is always affected by that of the body
<br>towards which they are cast. To prove this: let an opaque body be
<br>placed between the plane _s c t d_ and the blue light _d e_ and the
<br>red light _a b_, then I say that _d e_, the blue light, will fall on
<br>the whole surface _s c t d_ excepting at _o p_ which is covered by
<br>the shadow of the body _q r_, as is shown by the straight lines _d q
<br>o e r p_. And the same occurs with the light _a b_ which falls on
<br>the whole surface _s c t d_ excepting at the spot obscured by the
<br>shadow _q r_; as is shown by the lines _d q o_, and _e r p_. Hence
<br>we may conclude that the shadow _n m_ is exposed to the blue light
<br>_d e_; but, as the red light _a b_ cannot fall there, _n m_ will
<br>appear as a blue shadow on a red background tinted with blue,
<br>because on the surface _s c t d_ both lights can fall. But in the
<br>shadows only one single light falls; for this reason these shadows
<br>are of medium depth, since, if no light whatever mingled with the
<br>shadow, it would be of the first degree of darkness &c. But in the
<br>shadow at _o p_ the blue light does not fall, because the body _q r_
<br>interposes and intercepts it there. Only the red light _a b_ falls
<br>there and tinges the shadow of a red hue and so a ruddy shadow
<br>appears on the background of mingled red and blue.
<br>
<br>The shadow of _q r_ at _o p_ is red, being caused by the blue light
<br>_d e_; and the shadow of _q r_ at _o' p'_ is blue being caused by
<br>the red light _a b_. Hence we say that the blue light in this
<br>instance causes a red derived shadow from the opaque body _q' r'_,
<br>while the red light causes the same body to cast a blue derived
<br>shadow; but the primary shadow [on the dark side of the body itself]
<br>is not of either of those hues, but a mixture of red and blue.
<br>
<br>The derived shadows will be equal in depth if they are produced by
<br>lights of equal strength and at an equal distance; this is proved.
<br>[Footnote 53: The text is unfinished in the original.]
<br>
<br>[Footnote: In the original diagram Leonardo has written within the
<br>circle _q r corpo obroso_ (body in shadow); at the spot marked _A,
<br>luminoso azzurro_ (blue luminous body); at _B, luminoso rosso_ (red
<br>luminous body). At _E_ we read _ombra azzurra_ (blue tinted shadow)
<br>and at _D ombra rossa_ (red tinted shadow).]
<br>
<br>On the nature of colours (277. 278).</p>]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Page 275</title>
<link>http://interconnected.org/home/more/davinci/275.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>ANY SHADOW CAST BY AN OPAQUE BODY SMALLER THAN THE LIGHT CAUSING THE
<br>SHADOW WILL THROW A DERIVED SHADOW WHICH IS TINGED BY THE COLOUR OF
<br>THE LIGHT.
<br>
<br>Let _n_ be the source of the shadow _e f_; it will assume its hue.
<br>Let _o_ be the source of _h e_ which will in the same way be tinged
<br>by its hue and so also the colour of _v h_ will be affected by _p_
<br>which causes it; and the shadow of the triangle _z k y_ will be
<br>affected by the colour of _q_, because it is produced by it. [7] In
<br>proportion as _c d_ goes into _a d_, will _n r s_ be darker than
<br>_m_; and the rest of the space will be shadowless [11]. _f g_ is
<br>the highest light, because here the whole light of the window _a d_
<br>falls; and thus on the opaque body _m e_ is in equally high light;
<br>_z k y_ is a triangle which includes the deepest shadow, because the
<br>light _a d_ cannot reach any part of it. _x h_ is the 2nd grade of
<br>shadow, because it receives only 1/3 of the light from the window,
<br>that is _c d_. The third grade of shadow is _h e_, where two thirds
<br>of the light from the window is visible. The last grade of shadow is
<br>_b d e f_, because the highest grade of light from the window falls
<br>at _f_.
<br>
<br>[Footnote: The diagram Pl. III, No. 1 belongs to this chapter as
<br>well as the text given in No. 148. Lines 7-11 (compare lines 8-12 of
<br>No. 148) which are written within the diagram, evidently apply to
<br>both sections and have therefore been inserted in both.]</p>]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Page 274</title>
<link>http://interconnected.org/home/more/davinci/274.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>OF THE INTERSECTIONS OF THE IMAGES IN THE PUPIL OF THE EYE.
<br>
<br>The intersections of the images as they enter the pupil do not
<br>mingle in confusion in the space where that intersection unites
<br>them; as is evident, since, if the rays of the sun pass through two
<br>panes of glass in close contact, of which one is blue and the other
<br>yellow, the rays, in penetrating them, do not become blue or yellow
<br>but a beautiful green. And the same thing would happen in the eye,
<br>if the images which were yellow or green should mingle where they
<br>[meet and] intersect as they enter the pupil. As this does not
<br>happen such a mingling does not exist.
<br>
<br>OF THE NATURE OF THE RAYS COMPOSED OF THE IMAGES OF OBJECTS, AND OF
<br>THEIR INTERSECTIONS.
<br>
<br>The directness of the rays which transmit the forms and colours of
<br>the bodies whence they proceed does not tinge the air nor can they
<br>affect each other by contact where they intersect. They affect only
<br>the spot where they vanish and cease to exist, because that spot
<br>faces and is faced by the original source of these rays, and no
<br>other object, which surrounds that original source can be seen by
<br>the eye where these rays are cut off and destroyed, leaving there
<br>the spoil they have conveyed to it. And this is proved by the 4th
<br>[proposition], on the colour of bodies, which says: The surface of
<br>every opaque body is affected by the colour of surrounding objects;
<br>hence we may conclude that the spot which, by means of the rays
<br>which convey the image, faces--and is faced by the cause of the
<br>image, assumes the colour of that object.
<br>
<br>On the colours of derived shadows (275. 276).</p>]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Page 273</title>
<link>http://interconnected.org/home/more/davinci/273.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The edges of a colour(ed object) transmitted through a small hole
<br>are more conspicuous than the central portions.
<br>
<br>The edges of the images, of whatever colour, which are transmitted
<br>through a small aperture into a dark chamber will always be stronger
<br>than the middle portions.</p>]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Page 272</title>
<link>http://interconnected.org/home/more/davinci/272.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>That which casts the shadow does not face it, because the shadows
<br>are produced by the light which causes and surrounds the shadows.
<br>The shadow caused by the light _e_, which is yellow, has a blue
<br>tinge, because the shadow of the body _a_ is cast upon the pavement
<br>at _b_, where the blue light falls; and the shadow produced by the
<br>light _d_, which is blue, will be yellow at _c_, because the yellow
<br>light falls there and the surrounding background to these shadows _b
<br>c_ will, besides its natural colour, assume a hue compounded of
<br>yellow and blue, because it is lighted by the yellow light and by
<br>the blue light both at once.
<br>
<br>Shadows of various colours, as affected by the lights falling on
<br>them. That light which causes the shadow does not face it.
<br>
<br>[Footnote: In the original diagram we find in the circle _e_
<br>"_giallo_" (yellow) and the cirle _d_ "_azurro"_ (blue) and also
<br>under the circle of shadow to the left "_giallo_" is written and
<br>under that to the right "_azurro_".
<br>
<br>In the second diagram where four circles are placed in a row we find
<br>written, beginning at the left hand, "_giallo_" (yellow), "_azurro_"
<br>(blue), "_verde_" (green), "_rosso_" (red).]
<br>
<br>The effect of colours in the camera obscura (273-274).</p>]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Page 271</title>
<link>http://interconnected.org/home/more/davinci/271.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>OF PAINTING.
<br>
<br>The surface of a body assumes in some degree the hue of those around
<br>it. The colours of illuminated objects are reflected from the
<br>surfaces of one to the other in various spots, according to the
<br>various positions of those objects. Let _o_ be a blue object in full
<br>light, facing all by itself the space _b c_ on the white sphere _a b
<br>e d e f_, and it will give it a blue tinge, _m_ is a yellow body
<br>reflected onto the space _a b_ at the same time as _o_ the blue
<br>body, and they give it a green colour (by the 2nd [proposition] of
<br>this which shows that blue and yellow make a beautiful green &c.)
<br>And the rest will be set forth in the Book on Painting. In that Book
<br>it will be shown, that, by transmitting the images of objects and
<br>the colours of bodies illuminated by sunlight through a small round
<br>perforation and into a dark chamber onto a plane surface, which
<br>itself is quite white, &c.
<br>
<br>But every thing will be upside down.
<br>
<br>Combination of different colours in cast shadows.</p>]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Page 270</title>
<link>http://interconnected.org/home/more/davinci/270.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>OF THE RAYS WHICH CONVEY THROUGH THE AIR THE IMAGES OF OBJECTS.
<br>
<br>All the minutest parts of the image intersect each other without
<br>interfering with each other. To prove this let _r_ be one of the
<br>sides of the hole, opposite to which let _s_ be the eye which sees
<br>the lower end _o_ of the line _n o_. The other extremity cannot
<br>transmit its image to the eye _s_ as it has to strike the end _r_
<br>and it is the same with regard to _m_ at the middle of the line. The
<br>case is the same with the upper extremity _n_ and the eye _u_. And
<br>if the end _n_ is red the eye _u_ on that side of the holes will not
<br>see the green colour of _o_, but only the red of _n_ according to
<br>the 7th of this where it is said: Every form projects images from
<br>itself by the shortest line, which necessarily is a straight line,
<br>&c.
<br>
<br>[Footnote: 13. This probably refers to the diagram given under No.
<br>66.]</p>]]></description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

