<rdf:RDF
	xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>
<channel rdf:about="http://interconnected.org/home/mini/_9924">
	<title>Interconnected Mini Links</title>
	<link>http://interconnected.org/home/mini/_9924</link>
	<description>Links alongside interconnected.org (Single link 9924)</description>
	<dc:rights>Copyright Matt Webb</dc:rights>

<items><rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://interconnected.org/home/mini/_9924" />
</rdf:Seq></items>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://interconnected.org/home/mini/_9924">
<title> [delicious-discuss] 6,411,975,779 hand written labels   </title>
<link>http://lists.burri.to/pipermail/delicious-discuss/2005-January/001667.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Saul Albert says: "So I'm proposing a kind of tag-brokerage system. A system by which people can
form epistomology gangs who decide to share tags, and declare a concensually
decided-upon meaning and remit for them. That's when tags can start to become
categories, grouped, separated, weeded, updated, expanded etc..
The sensible constitutional starting point for such a brokerage, as Jo W has
pointed indicated, would be a nomic like system:"</p><p><a href="http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/nomic.htm">http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/nomic.htm</a> -- link for 'nomic like system'</p><p>Continues: "Epistemological gangs could, of course, form alliances and make inter-gang
deals to extend their combind abilities to make meaning. A giant on-line game,
repeatedly cross-referencing and indexing the 6,411,975,779 hand-written labels
attached to very object, concept, and system that could ever exist."
I love the way this is written. The reply: "Don't be such a librarian." Heh, grumpy Joshua!</p><p><a href="http://lists.burri.to/pipermail/delicious-discuss/2005-January/001668.html">http://lists.burri.to/pipermail/delicious-discuss/2005-January/001668.html</a> -- Joshua replies</p>]]></description>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
